RE: Some ideas for future POB Delegations from @proofofbrainio

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

I will vote for you to be one of the 3 :p who better than you ?

We can have a voting from all community members to choose the 3 people if this goes through .

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
3 comments
avatar
(Edited)

who better than you ?

C'mon man, "All seems fine to me" yet there is a glaringly obvious issue with the proposal (something any paranoid and security-sensitive person would pick up on in a flash).

To add, I'm not going to say how @onealfa should use his stake (never have, never will), but here is a nice meaty upvote to @informationvault's comment which isn't necessarily up there on the amazing scale, but it does raise some alarm to me when @informationvault has a habit of leaving empty comments (see below, just from today) and not exactly putting his money where his mouth is (no staked POB, some selling of POB, the selling I have no concern with since there are a mixture of reasons why this could be the case).

Not a great example of responsible voting but oh well.





https://he.dtools.dev/@informationvault?symbol=POB



Oh yeah, he also got rumbled for plagiarism today too. Link here.

Just pointing some stuff out, @onealfa must be sick of my opinion getting flicked in his direction but I just say it how I see it. I'm more than willing to admit when I'm wrong or being a jackass.

My vote is on people who are vigilant and truly understand the power behind their vote and what it means for the platforms overall health.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000
avatar

Ugh. These are the type of people who only try to suck out value from a system. The comments are so generic that I feel like they should not be rewarded at all. Not to mention the plagiarism.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yup, it's painfully obvious to notice. Not too sure what the best way to handle it is other than pointing it out for others to see.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

0
0
0.000